Latin American Economics and Catholic Social Teaching

New Colonialism Emerging

WHITHER BEIJING?

by Mark and Louise Zwick

[page 1 of 2]

Hopes welled up in many of us when we first read about the United Nations fourth world conference on women in Beijing this September--even though the irony of its location was not lost on us.

Maybe the concerns of poor women of the world would really be addressed. Perhaps the dignity of women of the poorer countries and economic development for those who suffer so much from the effects of poverty would be taken seriously on a global level. Could it be that the conference would speak to a "hedonistic and commercial culture that encourages the systematic exploitation of sexuality and corrupts even very young girls into letting their bodies be used for profit" (Pope John Paul II) and call our world to treat even poor women with respect and dignity? Would it be possible that our world could go beyond the self-interest of post-modern capitalism to consider the needs of poor women? It would be too good to be true.

The preliminary document and the pre-conference meetings indicated exactly that. It might be too good to be true.

What do Third World Women Want?


At Casa Juan Diego we know the poverty, suffering and misery of so many Third World women, especially those of Latin America.

The women of Latin America, Asia and Africa are in trouble. Their national economies deteriorate each day for the vast majority, the poor, while economic theories are debated and promoted in universities and congresses and structures like the World Bank. Life is at risk at basic survival levels for too many Third World families. Women try to hold their families together, but pressures on them are enormous.

There is some growing similarity, on a lesser level, here in the United States, where it becomes more difficult each day to find a decent paying job which can provide basic needs and health care for the poor. When the measure of all is the profit motive, it makes sense to companies to move to Latin America to take advantage of slave wages. It is logical in this scheme of things to want to pay $14.00 a week in Honduras instead of $14.00 an hour in the United States.

When women come to Casa Juan Diego from other countries, they speak about the children they have left behind and how they must come to try to find work here so that their children might have something to eat, go to school and have some kind of a future.

And when we visit Latin America we talk there with women and hear of their hopes, their pain, their struggles and sometimes their desperation.

We hear about their concern to give their children better nutrition and to have health care for their children. We hear about the tremendous desire for education for their children and for job skills. But the desire for education is often blocked by the lack of money even for shoes, entrance fees for public schools and school supplies.

We hear about women's great desire for a stable family life with the basics for decent survival--for a job for the husband where he can make enough to keep his respect and, if needed and desired, a job for the woman also. Usually, desperate couples both seek work, but there is not enough work. We hear about the daily struggle to meet expenses for a tiny house (often made of packing boxes) and food, with prices always increasing beyond what wages will buy. We hear of families in Mexico since the recent economic crisis where the woman must go into prostitution because her husband has lost his low-paying job and there no other jobs for wife or husband. There is no alternative.

What a commentary on the new global economy.

Women want economic development that is not dependent on huge multinational companies from the first world controlling the markets. They want to be able to sell items at low prices so people can buy them and the small business person can make a living. (This is now being prohibited with any small imported items because of the NAFTA agreements. Prices must be at transnational standards).

Women want to be able to pursue small businesses, so many of which have been broken because of NAFTA competition from the big companies. Young women who work in the maquiladoras of these companies want the right to organize unions and the right not be blackballed when they do so.

Latin American women tell us they want economic development that is not tied to sterilization, contraception and abortion. Recently a Mexican woman told us they want to be able to go into the hospital without being secretly sterilized. This woman found out a year later that her uterus had been removed.

In July of this year the Mexican newspapers carried announcements that the World Bank would lend money to the state of Chiapas, the source of a challenge from the poor to the Mexican government. The same day's newspapers carried an announcement by the governor of a massive campaign to sterilize the women of Chiapas. These programs are tied to any assistance from the World Bank.

The poor women of Latin America with whom we speak value children and family next to God. It is one of the most important values in their culture. Take away their children and you take away everything. By contrast, people of Anglo cultures sometimes prize efficiency and progress over all else.

The women of Latin America want a better economic system in which their men will not be forced to migrate to another country in search of work while they are left alone with the children.

And it may be chic to address the Third World as if men and children do not exist, but this does not address the Latin American reality.

What is being Emphasized at Beijing?


We hope and pray that these concerns of Latin American and other Third World women will be presented at Beijing.

However, it appears that some women of the First World (richer nations like the U.S., Japan, South Korea, England, France, Germany and Italy), have a different view of what is good for Third World women. The emphasis in the preparatory document for this conference is centered on population control, abortion and sterilization, even though the conference is ostensibly on women, not on population control. Even the part of the document on economic development is tied to population control for women participants. No population control--no aid!

While the Beijing preparatory document mentions the feminization of poverty, it does not recognize that this problem in the Third World is not necessarily a question of undervaluing women's work by their own countries (which also may be the case), but is highly influenced by the practice and requirements of the new global economy.

First, there are no jobs for many men in this economy. The men travel to one country after another within continents such as Africa or Latin America to find work and their wives and children are left at home in poverty. The common practice of the maquiladoras of hiring only women (particularly very young women or minors) or very young men, has left many fathers of families with the necessity to migrate.

The crushing debts owed to the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund for unwise loans made by these institutions are the source of much of the poverty which hurts women and families throughout the Third World. At the preconference meeting powerful nations opposed any debt relief to help poor nations, and thus especially, poor women. There was also opposition to emphasizing arms reductions and the transfer of military budgets to social programs and economic developments.

Some groups have insisted on presenting religion or even values in a negative light in the document. Religious groups are the very one who could provide the vision to do something about the exploitation of poor women.

And for us, worst of all, was the opposition of the First World to even mentioning the suffering, the concerns and rights of migrant women in this world conference on women.

The Beijing conference will have an impact on national and international policies. The language of documents published at such a United Nations meeting are cited for years to come as the norm for countries and the world. There are many groups who are non-governmental organizations who were present at the pre-conference and who will be present in Beijing. These groups lobby for their particular point of view, sometimes very aggressively, with the government representatives who attend the conference. Some of the strongest lobbying groups are from the First World and represent secular Western points of view. Will the First World concern to maintain our consumer life styles and our powerful position dominate the conference or will the real concerns of Third World women be addressed? Or will there be a new colonialism to dominate those who once were colonies, but hoped they were independent and free?

Save Environment


First World concerns for the environment have focused tremendous energy and often coercion on population control programs because of what has become a panic, or almost hysteria, about using up the world's resources too quickly.

next page

Home || Newspaper  || About Casa Juan Diego  || Contacts || Related Links